By Blake Jackson
Pennsylvania farmers are advocating for fairer compensation when their land is taken through eminent domain, arguing the current system undervalues their property. Senator Cris Dush's proposed bill would require the state to consider "lost goodwill," encompassing factors like location, cultural heritage, and reputation. This mirrors a California law, and farmers argue it reflects the intellectual property they invest in their land.
Route 322 Expansion Project Highlights Need for Change
The proposed Route 322 expansion near State College, expected to take farmland in Penns Valley, serves as a rallying point for farmers. Jesse Darlington, whose farm lies in the path, could lose crucial cropland or even his barn and house. He emphasizes the difficulty of finding comparable land, especially considering his high yields.
Concerns Beyond Immediate Compensation
Farmers like Darlington also worry about future cash flow disruptions and the cost of relocating equipment. They point to the lengthy legal battles and financial strain experienced by businesses like Fox's Pizza Den in Ridgway, whose owner Scott Jacobs describes his relocation due to eminent domain as "11 years of pure hell."
Balancing Public and Private Needs
Senator Amanda Cappelletti acknowledges the need to balance public project benefits with the impact on private landowners. The bill faces potential challenges, but farmers and their advocates hope it will lead to a more just system that recognizes the true value of their land and livelihoods.
Photo Credit: pa-farm-bureau
Categories: Pennsylvania, Government & Policy